
If you sold crypto in 2025, a Form 1099-DA probably arrived early this year showing what you sold for and nothing about what you paid. That gap is a major source of crypto tax anxiety right now, and 2026 is the year it starts to close.
Form 1099-DA cost basis reporting becomes mandatory for brokers on certain transactions effected on or after January 1, 2026. The word carrying the weight in that sentence is “certain.” A large share of the crypto people actually hold will not qualify, so the statement arriving in early 2027 will still have blanks in it.
This guide covers what changed, how to tell which of your assets your broker must price and which it will not, how to read the two boxes that decide the answer, and what to do with the gaps that remain.
Starting with transactions on or after January 1, 2026, brokers must report cost basis on Form 1099-DA, but only for digital assets that are covered securities. A digital asset is covered only if you acquired it after 2025 inside an account where the broker provided custodial services and it stayed in that account until the broker effected the disposition. Everything else, including coins bought earlier or transferred in from a wallet, is noncovered. For those, Box 1g may be blank and your own records determine basis.
Form 1099-DA is the information return brokers file for sales and exchanges of digital assets. Brokers began reporting gross proceeds for transactions on or after January 1, 2025, which is why the first statements landed at the start of 2026.
Gross proceeds means what you received. On its own it says nothing about whether you made money.
That asymmetry is deliberate. The final regulations phased the obligation in, proceeds first and basis second, giving brokers time to build systems that can follow a purchase price across an asset class where holdings move between platforms constantly. The second phase is the one arriving now.
A proceeds figure in the six figures does not mean you owe tax on six figures. Your gain is proceeds minus basis, and an active trader who bought and sold the same position repeatedly can show enormous proceeds against a modest gain. The IRS receives the same statement you do, though, so a mismatch between that figure and your return is what draws attention. Reconciliation matters more than the size of the number.

Here is the 2026 change stated plainly. For transactions effected on or after January 1, 2026, brokers must report basis information for digital assets that are covered securities. For digital assets that are not covered securities, basis reporting stays voluntary.
The entire practical difficulty of the next few filing seasons sits inside the word covered.
Under the instructions for Form 1099-DA, a covered security is a digital asset acquired after 2025 for cash, stored-value cards, different digital assets, or any property or services whose disposition the broker is required to report, in an account for which the broker provided custodial services. The asset qualifies only if you acquired it in an account where the broker provided custodial services and you held it in that account until the broker effected the disposition.
Three conditions all have to hold:
Break any one and the asset is noncovered.
Condition three is where most crypto falls out, because moving assets is normal behavior. People buy on one platform, move to a hardware wallet for security, and move back to sell where liquidity is better. Every one of those moves severs the custodial chain the definition requires.
A broker receiving an inbound transfer can see what arrived and when. It cannot see what you paid or when you bought it, and the regulations do not ask it to guess.
The practical rule is uncomfortable but simple: basis gets reported for assets that were acquired and sold at the same broker, after 2025, without leaving in between.

Two fields carry the whole story.
Box 1g, Cost or other basis. The broker enters the adjusted basis of the digital asset sold, unless the asset is noncovered and the relevant exception applies. If Box 1g is blank, the instructions are direct: you determine your basis from your own books and records.
Box 9, Noncovered security. A check here means the broker classified the asset as noncovered. Brokers may voluntarily report basis information for noncovered digital assets, and when they check Box 9 they are not subject to certain penalties under sections 6721 and 6722 if that voluntarily reported information is incorrect.
That second point is counterintuitive and worth sitting with. A basis figure next to a checked Box 9 is a courtesy, not a certification. The broker has told you it is not standing behind the number. If it conflicts with your records, well documented records are generally the stronger evidence, and you should be able to show why.
Sorting your statements into three piles before anything else makes the work finite:
Basis reporting only works if everyone agrees which units left the account, and the regulations settle that with an identification framework most filers have never had to think about.
For digital asset units held in your broker’s custody, the regulations generally let you make an adequate identification by specifying the units to the custodial broker no later than the date and time of the sale, disposition, or transfer, using any identifier the broker designates as sufficiently specific to let it determine the basis and holding period of those units. A standing order or instruction communicated to the broker also works.
The timing is the part people miss. This is not a filing season decision. The instruction has to exist at or before the moment of sale.
Miss that window and the fallback applies. Without an adequate identification, the regulations treat the units as sold in order of time from the earliest date on which units of that same digital asset held in the custody of the broker were acquired, a first in first out result.
FIFO is not inherently bad, but it is rarely what a filer would choose. In a market that has risen over several years, FIFO surfaces your oldest and cheapest units first, which usually means the largest gain.
Treasury and the IRS recognized that some brokers did not have the technology in place by January 1, 2025 to accept specific instructions or standing orders, which could push affected taxpayers into FIFO through no fault of their own. Notice 2026-20 describes a narrower gap for the extended period, referring to brokers that are not yet able to accept adequate identifications other than standing orders.
Notice 2025-7 provided temporary relief allowing eligible taxpayers to use certain alternative methods of making an adequate identification for units held in a broker’s custody. Notice 2026-20 extended that relief for an additional year, and the relief period now runs from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2026.
Under that relief, where you have made an adequate identification in your own books and records of units sold, disposed of, or transferred during 2026, those are the units treated as sold for federal income tax purposes, regardless of whether the broker’s reported information matches your records.
The condition is that the identification exists in your books and records. Contemporaneous records are the entire mechanism, which rewards the filer who logs decisions during the year and does nothing for the one reconstructing everything in April.
Running underneath the form change is a shift in how basis is tracked at all, and it matters because broker reporting is per account by construction.
Rev. Proc. 2024-28 provides a safe harbor under section 1012(c)(1) on which taxpayers may rely to allocate unused basis of digital assets to digital assets held within each wallet or account. It exists to move filers off a universal or multi-wallet basis pool and onto a wallet by wallet, account by account approach.
The allocation must be reasonable and must be made as of January 1, 2025, and the revenue procedure permits either a specific unit allocation or a global allocation.
If your internal records still pool basis across every wallet you own while your statements describe single accounts, the two sets of numbers describe different things and reconciling them becomes guesswork. If you have not worked through whether this applies to you, raise it with a qualified tax professional rather than assuming a software default handled it.
Consider three sales at the same custodial broker during 2026.
| Sale | Acquisition | Custody history | Classification | What Box 1g likely shows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sale 1 | Bought on the platform, April 2026 | Never left the account | Covered | Basis reported by the broker |
| Sale 2 | Bought on the same platform, 2023 | Never left the account | Noncovered | Blank, or voluntary with Box 9 checked |
| Sale 3 | Bought in self-custody, March 2026 | Transferred in, August 2026 | Noncovered | Blank, or voluntary with Box 9 checked |
Only the first line produces the clean, fully populated statement people imagine when they hear that brokers now report basis. The second fails the acquisition date test. The third fails the continuous custody test even though the purchase happened well after the cutoff. Same asset, same broker, same year, three different outcomes.
You bought units in a self-custody wallet in March 2026, transferred them to your custodial broker in August, and sold in December.
The statement shows proceeds. Box 9 is checked. Box 1g may be blank.
To report the sale correctly on Form 8949 you need the March acquisition date and the amount you paid, including transaction fees, from your own records. The wallet history and the on-chain transaction give you the date and quantity. Your purchase record gives you the amount.
Then confirm the August transfer was recorded as a transfer, not a disposal. A self transfer misclassified as a sale creates a taxable event that never happened and corrupts the basis of everything downstream. This is a common mechanical error in crypto tax records and it is avoidable with good records.
None of this is exotic. It is evidence you either captured when it happened or have to reconstruct later, and reconstruction gets harder every month as exchange histories get archived and platforms change.
CRPTM is a crypto portfolio tracker and US crypto tax calculator built for the reconciliation problem this article describes.
You can read more about the underlying crypto tax calculator or start with our guide to Form 8949 for crypto.
Brokers must report basis on certain transactions effected on or after January 1, 2026. Statements covering those transactions arrive in the following filing season.
No. A digital asset is a covered security only if acquired after 2025 in a custodial account at that broker. Assets acquired earlier are noncovered, and basis reporting for them is voluntary.
Box 1g carries cost or other basis. Box 9 indicates that the digital asset is a noncovered security.
Determine your basis from your own books and records. A blank Box 1g does not mean zero basis, and reporting zero would overstate your gain.
It means the broker classified the asset as noncovered. If the broker also reported basis voluntarily, it is not subject to certain penalties for failing to report or furnish that information correctly.
A digital asset is covered only if it stayed in the custodial account until the broker effected the disposition. An inbound transfer breaks that chain, so the broker is not required to report basis even when you can document what you paid.
The regulations treat the earliest acquired units of that digital asset held in the broker’s custody as sold first, a first in first out result.
Notice 2025-7 provided temporary relief permitting certain alternative methods of adequate identification, and Notice 2026-20 extended it. The relief period runs from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2026.
Rev. Proc. 2024-28 provides a safe harbor for allocating unused basis of digital assets to assets held within each wallet or account, moving filers off a universal basis pool. The allocation must be reasonable and made as of January 1, 2025.
Yes. Form 1099-DA is an information return filed by the broker. Reporting each disposition accurately on Form 8949 remains your responsibility, and CRPTM does not e-file or submit returns on your behalf.
The headline is real: Form 1099-DA cost basis reporting arrives with 2026 transactions. The fine print is equally real, and it is where the work lives. Coverage requires an asset acquired after 2025, in a custodial account, held there until sale, and a great deal of ordinary crypto activity fails at least one of those tests.
The filers who find next spring uneventful will be the ones who kept clean per account records through the year, resolved missing purchase history while the source data still existed, and treated broker statements as something to reconcile rather than accept. Where your facts involve transfers, older holdings, or a basis method you are unsure about, a qualified tax professional is worth the call.
For the wider picture, the 2026 US crypto tax overview puts this form in context, and tracking your portfolio through the year is how you avoid the April scramble.
This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute tax, legal, or financial advice. Federal and state tax rules may change. Consult a qualified tax professional regarding your specific circumstances.